A Modern Monte Cristo (1917)
Movies I watch so you don't have to: A Modern Monte Cristo (1917)
A Modern Monte Cristo. 50 minutes, screenplay by Alexandre Dumas (novel) and Lloyd Lonergan. 1917, pub: Thanhouser Film Corporation. Starring: Vincent Serrano. Director: Eugene Moore
OK, then... this 1917 film is called "A Modern Monte Cristo" and runs less than one hour! The poster/handbill says, "A tale of romance and adventure such as all the world likes to see." It's Monte Cristo-related, so I must watch!Dr. Emerson (Dantes) is accused via anonymous letter of killing a patient for money, sent by his friend/romantic rival, Deane (Fernand/Danglars/Villefort). The police come and take Emerson away, but something's really missing... the title card says that a year later, he's living in an obscure boarding house. A newspaper headline says his fiancee, Miss Malcolm, married Deane, and it was believed that Emerson killed himself.
Some 6 years later, we're told that Deane's wife died, leaving him a daughter, Virginia (Valentine). In the meantime, Emerson had learned to be a sailor and befriends Virginia when the Deanes inspect their ships. Later, due to a sleepy caretaker, Virginia is unsupervised, goes aboard alone and falls into a hatch, injuring herself. The ship goes to sea. Emerson tells the crew that he was a surgeon, and takes care of the girl. Deane is frantic over his missing daughter.
Playing "Gilligan's Island" |
Years later, Virginia grows up meets the new hero, Tom Pemberton (Maximilian) at camp. For some reason, Virginia is of high enough social status to go to high-class parties and meets Tom again. Then, a rich foreigner, Gen. Fonsca of Brazil (Emerson) arrives. Emerson befriends Deane and offers to loan him money. Virginia and Tom fall in love. Deane says they may marry.
Locking the girl in his room! |
Ship disappears. Good riddance! |
THE END.
Yeah, this is kind of crap. I'm sure it was "modern" by 1917 standards, and it is now over 100 years removed from our time, and another 100 years removed from the original book's setting. That way, it could be filmed on the cheap, with no period architecture or costumes needed. And it's loaded with plot holes:
- Was Emerson even sent to jail? If so, for only a year? Why was he in a boarding house?
- "Once Doctor Emersons Fiancee is now Bride of His Friend" (sic) doesn't sound like front page news.
- Why would a captain and a crew of experienced sailors voluntarily sail a ship that leaks and has rotten rigging? They could and should say "Nope." They know it leaks but they still sail it into a storm anyway. And when the ship sinks, we only know of two survivors.
- Are pearls really worth that much, rivaling the Spada Family Treasure?
- We don't know how Emerson got off the island! Or why he's interested in buying the island!
- Deane starts losing money, but it all seems to be bad luck and chance, without Emerson manipulating things behind the scenes to make this happen.
- Why is Deane promising to get rid of Tom so Emerson can marry his daughter? It's the modern 20th century. She has a say in it!
- Why is Emerson even demanding to marry Deane's daughter? Is he planning on trapping her in a loveless, abusive marriage to himself?
- Deane and Emerson tell the captain that a possibly violent, raving invalid (Tom) will be brought onboard and to pay no mind. But not too long afterwards, the captain doesn't recognize the switcheroo'd drugged man as the ship's owner, Deane, who he saw just hours ago and he can't even recognize his own boss.
- Emerson lures Virginia to his house, locks the door and sends a note to her father, saying that she will pay his debts, he can get her "tomorrow in my rooms" and she will be "disgraced". The implications are very disturbing. What is Emerson planning to do to Virginia behind a locked door to "disgrace" her father? Do we even want to know?
- The ending, where Emerson and Deane go down on the ship together is basically "revenge via suicide". What a great idea!!! /s
Man loves his daughter. Can't hate him. |
Emerson, as Gen. Fonsca, is disturbing as hell. His inspiration, the Count of Monte Cristo, would never a) Separate an innocent young woman from the young man she loves. b) Demand that a woman should marry him against her will. c) Act as if this "marriage" was a financial transaction between her father and himself d) Lock his doors, trapping a woman inside his house e) Imply rape as a way to "disgrace her father" and make her "pay off her father's debts".
Hero: "I've kidnapped your daughter" | |
Comments
Post a Comment